CLIL對於學習者和老師的動機有什麼影響？

有較高的動機，就可以使學習者有更深入、專注的學習，當然，最重要的是確保其在目標語言的學習感就。因此，提供情感方面的證據，也是CLIL讓自己可以被社會接收的方式。透過大規模的問卷或焦點團體訪談都可以得到這樣的證據。

Hood (2006) 訪談第一年和第二年參加CLIL學程的學生，結論第一年參加學程的學生抗拒者有之、期待者有之、懷疑者也有之，第二年參加學程的學生則多是正面的評價。Marsh et al. (2008) 的研究中則顯示，CLIL下學習的學生存在工具性動機(instrumental motivation)，這讓學習者更願意去國外進行交換且認為拓展了視野。Campo,Grisaleña and Alonso (2007) 發現，在CLIL學程下的學生，女性比男性有更高的動機。Lasagabaster and Sierra (2009) 也發現，有CLIL經驗的女性比起男性，也對其它語言更感興趣。

Dalton-Puffer,Hüttner,Schindelegger and Smit (2009) 評估在職業學校下CLIL的動機證據，問卷結果發現在曾經參加過CLIL的學生中表示：在外語的環境下工作，可能在內容的深度上會被犧牲。但是，學生都認為自己的語言能力比起非CLIL學習的學習者好。值得一提的是，當CLIL下的學科老師的語言能力沒那麼完全的時候，學習者會投入更多努力以確保最終可以完成工作。

然而，yassin2009在馬來西亞的脈絡下也發現，英語能力比較差的學生在看CLIL的時候，就有較負面的觀點。

另外，Woodfield and Neofitou (2006) 也從教室的氣氛(classroom climate)和選課人數來評估CLIL學程對學習者情感的影響。

除了學習者的以外，教師也會受到CLIL的影響。在CLIL下，一個老師不是語言專業的老師(語言老師)，就是內容專業的老師(學科老師)，很少老師能夠同時擁有語言和內容專業。因此，在CLIL的場閾下，老師會帶著焦慮去提升教學實踐(不論主動或被動)(Moate, 2011) 。例如上課時，教師應該提出什麼樣的問題就會很有挑戰。

References

Airey, J. (2009). Estimating undergraduate bilingual scientific literacy in Sweden. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 26-35.

Campo, A., Grisaleña, J. & Alonso, E. (2007). Trilingual Students in Secondary School: A New Reality. Bilbao: Basque Institute of Educational Evaluation and Research, , .

Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010c). Evaluating and creating materials and tasks for CLIL classroom. In (), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010a). Evaluating the impact of CLIL programmes. In (), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010b). The CLIL Tool Kit: Transforming theory into practice. In (), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., Schindelegger, U. & Smit, U. (2009). Technology-Geeks Speak Out: What Students Think About Vocational CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 18-25.

Dalton-Puffer, C. & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 241-267.

De Graaff, R., Jan Koopman, G., Anikina, Y. & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603-624.

Hood, P. (2006). Unpublished data from CLIL research interviews with students at Tile Hill Wood Language College. , , .

Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), .

Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4-17.

Marsh, D. et al. (2008). Profile Report: Bilingual Education (English) in Poland. Warszawa: The National Centre for Teacher Training and Development (CODN) & British Council Poland, , .

Moate, J. M. (2011). The impact of foreign language mediated teaching on teachers’ sense of professional integrity in the CLIL classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 333-346.

Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 60-73.

Westhoff, G. (2004). The art of playing a pinball machine. Characteristics of effective SLA-tasks. Babylonia, 12(3), 58-62.

Woodfield, J. & Neofitou, A. (2006). Immersion Project Research Findings. , , .